Left-Wing Groups Push 2020 Dem Candidates to Back Defense Spending Cuts


Nearly two dozen liberal groups on Thursday wrote to all 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, pushing them to support massive cuts to the defense budget.

The progressive groups urged the candidates to back cutting $200 billion or more from the Pentagon's annual budget, which exceeded $700 billion for the current fiscal year, the Associated Press reported.

The left-wing effort, called "Put People Over the Pentagon," seeks to make defense spending a prominent issue in the presidential race."

"Hundreds of billions of dollars annually should be shifted away from the Pentagon and to pressing needs from education to averting catastrophic climate change," Robert Weissman, president of the watchdog nonprofit Public Citizen, told the AP. "America needs leaders who will speak plain truths about Pentagon excesses and waste."

Multiple White House hopefuls, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.), have criticized defense spending levels as too high, arguing that much of the money should be directed elsewhere.

"At the exact same time as [President Donald Trump] and many of my Republican colleagues want to substantially increase military spending, they want to throw 32 million Americans off of the health insurance they currently have because, supposedly, they are worried about the budget deficit," Sanders said during a major speech on foreign policy in 2017. "While greatly increasing military spending they also want to cut education, environmental protection, and the needs of children and seniors."

The progressive push to slash the Pentagon's budget comes as defense analysts are calling on the U.S. government to increase defense spending, to be able to counter Chinese and Russian aggression while simultaneously maintaining sufficient military assets in the Middle East. Last year, in a major assessment of American military power, the Heritage Foundation found that the United States is capable of fighting a single major regional conflict "while also attending to various presence and engagement activities," but would be "ill-equipped" to fight two such conflicts simultaneously.

"The Active Component of the U.S. military is two-thirds the size it should be, operates equipment that is older than should be the case, and is burdened by readiness levels that are problematic," stated the report, which rated the country's military posture as "marginal."

Aaron Kliegman

Aaron Kliegman   Email | Full Bio | RSS
Aaron Kliegman is the news editor of the Washington Free Beacon. Prior to joining the Free Beacon, Aaron worked as a research associate at the Center for Security Policy, a national security think tank, and as the deputy field director on Micah Edmond's campaign for U.S. Congress. In December 2016, he received his master's degree from Johns Hopkins University’s Global Security Studies Program in Washington, D.C., with a concentration in strategic studies. He graduated from Washington and Lee University in 2014 and lives in Leesburg, Virginia. His Twitter handle is @Aaron_Kliegman. He can be reached at kliegman@freebeacon.com.

Get the news that matters most to you, delivered straight to your inbox daily.

Register today!
  • Grow your email list exponentially
  • Dramatically increase your conversion rates
  • Engage more with your audience
  • Boost your current and future profits