Former Obama administration Ambassador to Israel Daniel Shapiro called on all Democrats to condemn Rep. Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.) for her "outrageous" claims that American politicians support Israel because they're paid off.
Omar, who frequently has to deny she's an anti-Semite, stepped into controversy again on Sunday when she suggested in a tweet that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) was being paid off to criticize her and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D., Mich.) for their anti-Israel stances.
When asked by a liberal magazine editor who exactly was paying politicians to support Israel, she wrote back "AIPAC," the pro-Israel lobbying group.
Even some progressives criticized Omar for the tweets, which they said smacked of anti-Semitic tropes against American Jews. Shapiro, who was appointed to the post by Obama in 2011 and served until 2017, sent a flurry of tweets Monday morning that called for Omar to be "condemned by all in our party."
1. @IlhanMN's outrageous comments equating politicians' support for Israel with being bought off by American Jewish money are a vile anti-Semitic trope. They need to be condemned by all in our party.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
He noted Democrats were largely quiet when Omar flip-flopped on her support for the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, known as BDS.
"Her support for BDS is apparently her essence: blaming Israel alone for the conflict, absolving Palestinians of all responsibility, delegitimizing Israel's very existence, &accusing its supporters of shallow motives &manipulation by Jewish money," he wrote.
2. Some of us remained uncomfortably quiet after her BDS flip-flop &other offensive remarks because we were aware of efforts to work with her: by colleagues, party leaders, her local Jewish community in MN. She indicated to them she had other policy priorities, not Is/Pal issues.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
3. But these efforts have failed. Her support for BDS is apparently her essence: blaming Israel alone for the conflict, absolving Palestinians of all responsibility, delegitimizing Israel's very existence, &accusing its supporters of shallow motives &manipulation by Jewish money.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
"Her approach indicates she doesn't want to be a consensus builder or understand others' views. She wants to push her extreme view, embarrassing her Democratic colleagues who inevitably are asked to respond. She's made herself a lightning rod. It will isolate her. And it should," she wrote.
He said her positions would only serve to further isolate her in the debate.
4.Her approach indicates she doesn't want to be a consensus builder or understand others' views. She wants to push her extreme view, embarrassing her Democratic colleagues who inevitably are asked to respond. She's made herself a lightning rod. It will isolate her. And it should.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
5. There's plenty of room to differ w/Israeli policy, settlement expansion, the drift away from two-states, etc. Criticism of Israel's actions is not, by definition, anti-Israel or anti-Semitic. It should also take account of Israel's legitimate security concerns & many threats.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
6. Supporting Palestinians' legitimate aspirations for statehood &sympathy for their current hardships are mainstream &eminently reasonable. Any honest assessment would also take account of their leaders' responsibility for terror, incitement, &rejecting any legitimacy of Israel.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
6. Supporting Palestinians' legitimate aspirations for statehood &sympathy for their current hardships are mainstream &eminently reasonable. Any honest assessment would also take account of their leaders' responsibility for terror, incitement, &rejecting any legitimacy of Israel.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
7. Omar has many colleagues who've modeled how to strike this balance for years: supporting Israel's security &legitimacy &close US-Isr ties, supporting 2 states for 2 peoples, criticizing each side when warranted, differing with/Trump's approach that helps entrench the conflict.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
8. Had she come to DC, shown sympathy and empathy for Israelis and Palestinians, learned to assign responsibility in appropriate measure to both sides, considered the totality of US interests in the region, maybe taken a trip to learn, she could have had real influence.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
9. She could have avoided delegitimizing those who disagree with her as being in the thrall of campaign contributions, instead of acting on their own & their constituents' beliefs. Had she done so, she could have also educated a lot of people to consider views they may not have.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
10. Now, instead, she'll have much of DC, many in her own party, much of the Jewish community, &plenty of others turning against her. She did that. She chose that. She had little influence on Dem party positions on Israel/Palestine before. Thankfully, now she'll have even less.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
11. No one is trying to silence her. She can advocate any policy she wants. And if she'll listen, we should keep the door open. Meanwhile, those who strongly disagree with her views and find them ill-informed, offensive, and even anti-Semitic also have to speak up. We must. End.
— Dan Shapiro (@DanielBShapiro) February 11, 2019
Omar's latest tweets were also condemned by conservatives and some fellow liberals, including Chelsea Clinton and Democratic Reps. Max Rose (N.Y.), Sean Patrick Maloney (N.Y.), Tom Suozzi (N.Y.), and Anthony Brindisi (N.Y.), Josh Gottheimer (N.J.), and Donna Shalala (Fla.).