Hillary Clinton’s underwhelming book tour is still going on, in case you hadn’t noticed. The celebrity homeowner and child rapist defender appeared on “The Daily Show” on Tuesday, where she (quite literally) laughed her way through an interview with host Jon Stewart:
The New York Times reports on the disappointing sales of Hillary Clinton’s most recent memoir, Hard Choices. The book is currently ranked 108th on Amazon’s best-seller list, behind Ben Carson’s memoir One Nation (#75), and Potty (#45), the top-selling toilet training book for children.
Even more embarrassing, as the Times notes, is the fact that Hillary’s book is being outsold by Blood Feud, Edward Klein’s groundbreaking exposé on the testy relationship between the Clintons and the Obamas. Klein’s book is currently ranked 12th on the Amazon best-seller list.
On the bright side, Hard Choices continues to be the top selling book in Amazon’s “gender studies” category.
Vladimir Putin’s aggressive campaign to undermine American freedom is playing out right before our eyes. On the same day that presumed Russian operative Edward Snowden petitioned the Kremlin to extend his “temporary” asylum, Snowden associate and U.S. tax-evader Glenn Greenwald published another batch of illegally leaked intelligence documents. Leading pundits picked up the story:
We all know that Hillary Clinton is the most successful and influential female political leader of all time. We know this because Clinton and her supporters are constantly reminding us, and because her official resumes—via the White House, the State Department, PBS, and the Clinton Foundation—offer a case study in how to inflate one’s accomplishments with nonsense words. (The following is comprised almost entirely of direct quotes.)
It’s come to this. Because the entire American media establishment could not bring itself to ask Hillary Clinton about her 1975 defense of a child rapist, the task fell to, of all places, a British parenting website called Mumsnet.
The website asked its readers—aka “mumsnetters”—to submit questions for the former secretary of state, who took part in a webcast-style interview over the weekend. One of those questions prompted Clinton to make her first public comments on the rape case since the Free Beacon unearthed previously unpublished audio tapes of Clinton discussing it in the early 1980s, a story that broke nearly a month ago, on June 15.
In a Breitbart EXCLUSIVE, Sarah Palin drops the truth bomb we’ve all been waiting for:
It’s time to impeach [President Obama]; and on behalf of American workers and legal immigrants of all backgrounds, we should vehemently oppose any politician on the left or right who would hesitate in voting for articles of impeachment.
The many impeachable offenses of Barack Obama can no longer be ignored. If after all this he’s not impeachable, then no one is.
This is a great idea for several reasons, and should appeal to Americans of all political stripes. In fact, it’s basically a no-lose proposition for everyone involved. Here’s why:
Now that the media has been forced to cover the Free Beacon’s exclusive reporting on Hillary Clinton’s 1975 defense of a child rapist and her bizarre recounting of the case in an interview years later, they’ve struggled to come to terms with some basic facts about the case.
Tuesday’s “Morning Joe” segment on MSNBC is a perfect example:
Who has done more to brighten the lives of the world’s less fortunate: Hillary Clinton (1947-present)? Or the Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta (1910-1997)?
ISIS frontman Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s much-anticipated public rollout has been plagued by some of the same problems that Hillary Clinton has experienced on her mediocre book tour.
The Telegraph reports that al-Baghdadi—a.k.a. “Caliph Ibrahim”—whose Islamist terrorist group recently seized up to $400 million from an Iraqi bank as part of its effort to establish a global caliphate, is under fire for sporting a flashy wristwatch in a video released last week:
President Obama will celebrate the 4th of July weekend in part by ritually sacrificing majestic bald eagles on the alter of “green energy.” Liberals might call that progress. Real Americans would rightly call it what it is: bird murder.
Last week, the Obama administration gave a California wind farm permission to kill bald eagles with impunity for up to 30 years. The birds are supposed to be protected under federal law; without a waiver from the president, killing them would result in six-figure fines and up to 18 months in prison per eagle.
The move is just the latest escalation in the administration’s eco-genocide, which biologists estimate is responsible for the horrific death of hundreds of thousands of birds each year. The birds are typically chopped out of the sky in brutal fashion by the enormous and unsightly turbine blades.