Democrats argued against confirming Justice Amy Coney Barrett since she could intervene to help President Donald Trump if the election was contested. But on Tuesday neither Barrett nor any other justice dissented when the Supreme Court declined to hear a case challenging the Pennsylvania election results.
FLASHBACK: Dem Senators Argued ACB Couldn’t Be Trusted in Election Case
Related Articles
Christian Photographer Challenges Northam’s ‘Wedding Cake’ Law
Oversight Group Presses Justices to Remove Cruz, Hawley from Supreme Court Bar
Pro-Life Advocates Cheer Supreme Court Ruling Restricting Access to Abortion Pills
High Court to Weigh Campus Speech Rights
Despite Georgia Victories, Congressional Democrats Have Limited Options on Abortion
Dems Gain Full Control of Government
Protesters Threaten Hawley’s Wife and Child
Ossoff Promoted Chinese Propaganda Outlet After Stint as ‘National Security Aide’
Elizabeth Matamoros is a media analyst at the Washington Free Beacon. She previously consulted on political campaigns in Southern California and worked on Capitol Hill. Elizabeth graduated from the University of California, Riverside where she studied political science and marketing. She can be reached at matamoros@freebeacon.com.
