A Brief Glimpse Into the Future

Two business men having an informal meeting
AP
image/svg+xml

It's July of 2020. Donald Trump's prospects for reelection aren't particularly hot, given that his approval rating has hovered near 40 percent for the last three-and-a-half years. Despite this, gloom is on the faces of two Democratic consultants—Ted and Fred—meeting for coffee at the Starbucks on K Street, NW, in Washington, D.C.

(No, the other Starbucks.)

(No, the other one.)

(Right, that one.)

Ted, bemused to find the name "Dredd" scratched on his cup, takes his seat at the two-top where Fred, a scowl on his face, closes his Washington Post. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 1933-2020" reads the headline above the fold, in massive type. A city, and the party that dominates it, is in mourning. 

Ted: Who is named "Dredd," anyway? What is this, Mega-City One? Am I wearing a bulky police visor? Am I the law?

Fred: This is the worst day. Just the worst day.

Ted: Yeah, well, I'm sure the Republicans will uphold the Biden rule.

Fred and Ted exchange grimaces.

Fred: Would that it were so simple.

Ted: Well, what are the odds we convince Trump to pick someone good for us? Could sell it as a way for him to make inroads with moderates? Close that 15-point gap in the polls?

Fred: It'll never happen. I don't know if he knows he's finished—he was right and we were wrong last time—but I bet he knows he's finished if he stabs his base in the back with a RBG replacement who isn't a hard-line originalist.

Ted utters a low, guttural moan.

Fred: I still can't believe we got screwed on Eric Garland like that. If only—

Ted: Merrick.

Fred: —we'd stuck to [beat], what?

Ted: Merrick. Merrick Garland.

Fred: Are you sure?

Ted: Ayup.

Fred: [After a moment, brow furrowed] Who was Eric Garland?

Ted: You know, that crazy guy on Twitter?

Fred: So anyway, we got screwed on Merlin Garrick or whoever, got stuck with Gorsuch, and well, this sucks.

Ted: Maybe [takes a sip of his double macchiato] we shouldn't have pressured Schumer and the rest of the Senate to filibuster Gorusch?

Fred: We had to! For Derek Parland!

Ted: Well, I mean, I get it. Hell, I got it at the time. I was angry! I wanted revenge! Sure, it was obvious McConnell wasn't going to let the filibuster stop him—

Fred: As we nobly would have, bending to the tradition of the institution!

Ted: Heh, good one, but still, maybe, in retrospect, we should have kept that arrow in the quiver?

Fred: Certainly we could've used gutting Senate rules as a cudgel in one of the tight Senate races this year? Then we could've finally, maybe won control of the Senate?

Ted: Of course, we'd already have control right now if those Bernie Bro Jacotwats hadn't convinced folks to primary Manchin.

Fred: "What does it matter, he'd vote for Judge Napolitano, he's a squish, wahhh."

Ted: A goddamn 50-50 Senate.

Fred: "What does it matter, who cares who controls the Senate, there's no difference between parties, wahhh."

Ted: Sure, it'd be nice to be able to just shelve the Notorious RBG replacement—a little turnabout is fair play, you know? But hey: purity!

Fred: Ah well. At least President Chelsea Clinton will get to replace Kennedy.

Ted: Can you believe people believed her when she said she wasn't running?

Fred: A sucker's born every minute, my friend. Every minute.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT