ADVERTISEMENT

A Brief Glimpse Into the Future

Two business men having an informal meeting
AP
April 5, 2017

It's July of 2020. Donald Trump's prospects for reelection aren't particularly hot, given that his approval rating has hovered near 40 percent for the last three-and-a-half years. Despite this, gloom is on the faces of two Democratic consultants—Ted and Fred—meeting for coffee at the Starbucks on K Street, NW, in Washington, D.C.

(No, the other Starbucks.)

(No, the other one.)

(Right, that one.)

Ted, bemused to find the name "Dredd" scratched on his cup, takes his seat at the two-top where Fred, a scowl on his face, closes his Washington Post. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 1933-2020" reads the headline above the fold, in massive type. A city, and the party that dominates it, is in mourning. 

Ted: Who is named "Dredd," anyway? What is this, Mega-City One? Am I wearing a bulky police visor? Am I the law?

Fred: This is the worst day. Just the worst day.

Ted: Yeah, well, I'm sure the Republicans will uphold the Biden rule.

Fred and Ted exchange grimaces.

Fred: Would that it were so simple.

Ted: Well, what are the odds we convince Trump to pick someone good for us? Could sell it as a way for him to make inroads with moderates? Close that 15-point gap in the polls?

Fred: It'll never happen. I don't know if he knows he's finished—he was right and we were wrong last time—but I bet he knows he's finished if he stabs his base in the back with a RBG replacement who isn't a hard-line originalist.

Ted utters a low, guttural moan.

Fred: I still can't believe we got screwed on Eric Garland like that. If only—

Ted: Merrick.

Fred: —we'd stuck to [beat], what?

Ted: Merrick. Merrick Garland.

Fred: Are you sure?

Ted: Ayup.

Fred: [After a moment, brow furrowed] Who was Eric Garland?

Ted: You know, that crazy guy on Twitter?

Fred: So anyway, we got screwed on Merlin Garrick or whoever, got stuck with Gorsuch, and well, this sucks.

Ted: Maybe [takes a sip of his double macchiato] we shouldn't have pressured Schumer and the rest of the Senate to filibuster Gorusch?

Fred: We had to! For Derek Parland!

Ted: Well, I mean, I get it. Hell, I got it at the time. I was angry! I wanted revenge! Sure, it was obvious McConnell wasn't going to let the filibuster stop him—

Fred: As we nobly would have, bending to the tradition of the institution!

Ted: Heh, good one, but still, maybe, in retrospect, we should have kept that arrow in the quiver?

Fred: Certainly we could've used gutting Senate rules as a cudgel in one of the tight Senate races this year? Then we could've finally, maybe won control of the Senate?

Ted: Of course, we'd already have control right now if those Bernie Bro Jacotwats hadn't convinced folks to primary Manchin.

Fred: "What does it matter, he'd vote for Judge Napolitano, he's a squish, wahhh."

Ted: A goddamn 50-50 Senate.

Fred: "What does it matter, who cares who controls the Senate, there's no difference between parties, wahhh."

Ted: Sure, it'd be nice to be able to just shelve the Notorious RBG replacement—a little turnabout is fair play, you know? But hey: purity!

Fred: Ah well. At least President Chelsea Clinton will get to replace Kennedy.

Ted: Can you believe people believed her when she said she wasn't running?

Fred: A sucker's born every minute, my friend. Every minute.